• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Submit your local news to MyCapeTown HERE

  • WordPress
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Bluesky
My Cape Town

My Cape Town

Cape Town Community News and Events

  • Events
  • Daily News
  • Submit News
  • Dam Levels
  • Stratlec Shop
You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Integrated Resource Plan says no to nuclear

Integrated Resource Plan says no to nuclear

23 November 2016 by Con Tributor

Dear Editor

The DA welcomes and supports Minister of Energy, Tina Joemat-Pettersson’s, announcement of the nation’s first Integrated Energy Plan (IEP) and updated Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) today.

The Minister’s announcement is bold and is nothing short of transformative as it deals a serious blow to President Zuma’s attempts to finalise a corrupt and unnecessary nuclear deal.

Most importantly, the IRP – an electricity specific sectoral plan – makes two significant findings:

  • That South Africa does not require additional nuclear baseload capacity until the mid-2030s; and
  • That South Africa will require nothing near the 9.6 GW of additional nuclear base load capacity currently being touted by Eskom.

In practice, this means that the procurement process for nuclear can be postponed until at least the early 2020s.

The release of these two plans stands in sharp contrast the mountains of spin spewed into the public domain over the past 6 months by Eskom’s spin doctor in chief, Matshela Koko, who has consistently maintained that Eskom urgently requires additional nuclear base load capacity to be connected to the grid by no later than 2027. This would mean the finalisation of the procurement process by the end of the 2017.

In delivering the IEP and the IRP, the Minister has dealt Eskom and Jacob Zuma’s plan for a nuclear deal a serious blow.

Should the plans be adopted in their current form the Minister will have essentially delivered statutory and legal framework against which any nuclear acquisition by Eskom or by government can be measured and tested for rationality in a court of law.

The IRP and IEP therefore provide a sound basis to challenge future attempts by Eskom to acquire additional nuclear capacity which may be out of line with these overarching energy plans.

The Minister must be commended for her bravery in standing against the prevailing winds of state capture and bequeathing the South African people the legal and statutory basis to challenge an irrational and ruinous nuclear deal.

Regards

Gordon Mackay MP
DA Shadow Minister of Energy

Category: Uncategorized

you may also love

Letter to the Editor

2 412 learners fell pregnant in Western Cape schools in 2016

Dear Editor The latest statistics on teenage pregnancy indicate that over 2412 school girls in the Western Cape were pregnant …

Unions, Eskom aim to avert strike

South Africas biggest union and state power firm Eskom have voiced hope of averting a strike that could paralyse Africas …

Cape Town Lens: Portal, Saint-Laurent, 10ème, Paris, Île-de-France, France

A Cape Town District Six Museum tagged image from photographer – Billy Wilson Photography as published on …

Cape Town Lens: Llandudno 012

A Cape Town Llandudno tagged image from photographer – Pat Neary as published on Flickr. Llandudno 012 Image by Pat …

About Con Tributor

A catch all for the many contributors to My Cape Town – thank you for submitting your Cape Town news HERE.

Previous Post:Letter to the EditorR1 billon-plus of wasteful expenditure in the Adjustments Appropriation Bill
Next Post:Donald Trump is an old-fashioned chauvinist pig – Wendy Ackerman

Copyright © 2026 · My Cape Town · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Reach Trust